Pendente lite motions are requests made by a party to litigated divorce cases to ask the Court to grant certain relief while the case is ongoing. Pendente lite is latin for “while the action is pending.” Pendente lite orders are not intended to settle the divorce in its entirety as the final settlement or Judgment of Divorce becomes the final resolution of the case. They are supposed to tide things over, so to speak, until the rest of the case can be decided. There are various things that your New York City or Long Island Divorce Lawyer might ask the court to rule upon in a pendente lite motion. Motion practice usually consists of motions, opposition, cross-motions and any reply papers.
Custody and parenting time might be a part of a pendente lite order. This can include the issue of residence of the children, a schedule of parenting time or visitation, and the decision making involving the children. Sometimes the court will appoint an attorney for the child(ren) when there are issues involving the children that are not resolved. The allocation of fees between the parties for the attorney for the child(ren) is often ruled upon. A forensic investigation might be ordered by the court to help give insight into the children and the family to aid the court in deciding issues on custody and parenting time. Courts will usually not make a custody determination without having an evidentiary hearing, but it might be more inclined to issue a temporary order regarding the parenting time to help alleviate any preliminary scheduling issues.
Exclusive use and occupancy of the marital residence might be requested. Absent an agreement for exclusive use and occupancy, the law in what is called the Second Judicial Department is that a pendente lite award for exclusive use and occupancy should not be made unless there is a showing that the award is necessary in order to protect people and property. The Second Department covers Suffolk and Nassau County, Queens, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Rockland, Westchester, Dutchess, Putnam and Orange Counties. In cases where there is shown to be a risk to persons or property, an order of exclusive occupancy while the case is pending is appropriate. Without a showing or an agreement for the order, a Court should not deprive a person of access to his/her own property. Continue reading ›